The Hovertrax 2.0 is Razor’s try to grab a bit of the hyper-competitive hoverboard market. The two 2.0 self-balances, and therefore it’ll level the standing platform all alone when powered on. Due to this, or despite it, we found this board to be unpredictable. Following our battery of tests, one tester was heard to mutter: “Well, at least they have good customer support.”
Compare to Similar Products
Our Analysis and TEST OUTCOMES
The Hovertrax 2.0 is created by the popular Razor company which includes been making scooters for practically 2 decades. Unfortunately, our testers found this board to be overly sensitive and unpredictable.
The Hovertrax 2.0 by Razor
We buy all of the hoverboards we ensure that you run them through a standardized analysis of customer care, battery life, fun factor, and outdoor capabilities. The results of our analyses are quantifiable and reproducible. We make such painstaking efforts in order that we are able to draw direct comparisons for just one product to some other and understand that those comparisons are proportional.
In this metric we analyze the factors that donate to a board being fun. They are maneuverability, speed, color options, accessories, and weight. The Hovertrax cratered in this metric.
The Razor was agile to the idea of twitchiness.
Our panel of riders rode this board via an obstacle course comprising quick direction changes, a slalom, donuts, and a straightaway. They reported that board is jerky and overly sensitive. The Hovertrax also left much to be desired in the energy department. This shortcoming became evident when executing the required backwards and forwards maneuver as having less grab in the motors would occasionally cause the rider to dismount the board rapidly.
The Razor Hovertrax 2.0 not merely includes a maximum weight limit of 220 lbs but limits the consumption of their boards to eight years and older
However, the board comes in five colors and easily fits right into a third-party bags. Cool! We clocked the Hovertrax at 8.9 mph, which surpassed the manufacturer’s advertised max of 6 mph – it doesn’t happen frequently. However, we wouldn’t recommend pushing this board to the max as though felt pretty unstable at that speed.
Careful on the cracks! We actually broke the Razor driving over cracks and had to have a replacement from the maker.
The Hovertrax’s lackluster performance continued inside our outdoor functions tests. Our board broke in this phase of the analysis, and the business issued an upgraded (we gave them points of this in the support metric). In this metric we test how these boards handle rough roads and off-pavement terrain. The Razor broke when passing over a crack in the pub, thus proving that it generally does not fare well off flat, smooth surfaces.
This board felt just a little squirrelly on the steeper hills.
Support provided to the client by the product manufacturer is paramount for hoverboards. Just to illustrate, our board’s untimely demise throughout a routine test. As such, it really is mandatory that the hoverboard manufacturer be relatively simple to contact and they standby their product. Often that is as simple as providing knowledgeable, technical advice. Less common may be the dependence on repair or replacement. The Razor delivered an above-average performance in this metric, though we wouldn’t describe it as stellar.
While Razor did replace our board, we didn’t have the very best experience communicating with their support staff. However, we did reach speak to a human, which is a lot more than we are able to say about various other companies. You can also speak to Razor via email if indeed they so desire. Finally, this board comes with a 90-day limited warranty.
Hoverboards aren’t ridable when their batteries die. As such we test them because of their run time, travel radius, and recharge time. This model only traveled 3.4 miles inside our range test. This test is operate on smooth, flat pavement, i.e., ideal surface conditions for a hoverboard. Making matters worse, the Hovertrax only lasted for 69 minutes inside our obstacle course run time test.
The Hovertrax 2.0 had the shortest battery life of all models we tested.
Lastly, we recorded enough time it requires for the battery to recharge after being thoroughly exhausted. The product took 160 minutes to charge, which is approximately average for the class.
The Hovertrax 2.0 has several issues that, until resolved, can make it an unhealthy value at any price.
In closing, we wish to say that people were pleased that Razor stood by their product through the entire warrantee process. The staff was as helpful because they knew how exactly to be and polite aswell. However, our experience with the merchandise itself was abysmal. Not only an unhealthy performer, this board didn’t complete many of our tests. Moreover, it’s the only board that testers refused to ride more often than once since it made them feel uneasy. Should you be buying hoverboard, any other board in this review can do better the Hovertrax.