The Razor E300 simply does not perform at the same level as the other products here reviewed. For instance, it comes with an extremely short travel radius and an extended charging time. Moreover, the scooter will not so much as hint at the needs of the commuter oriented customer. Overall we were significantly less than impressed with this well-known brand’s electric scooter.
Get Upto 50% Off in Amazon Black Friday Sale
Compare to Similar Products
Our Analysis and TEST OUTCOMES
This electric scooter has several features that are unique in the class. First, it runs on the sealed lead acid battery which is interesting due to the fact lithium-ion batteries have grown to be the typical. The E300 also runs on the chain-driven motor to transfer capacity to the rear wheel, and therefore there is absolutely no electronic hub brake. Finally, the frame and fork are made of steel. Given the look and the prospective consumer (primarily children), it’s no wonder that product failed to meet up with the standards set by the other scooters here reviewed. In addition, it didn’t help our E300 broke during testing and needed to be returned.
The Razor E300
In our dogged seek out the very best electric scooters available, we scoured the net, reading manufacturer specs, analyzing design features and, combing through customer reviews. Ultimately, we purchased the most promising scooters for head-to-head testing. We then devised several tests to weigh all of the components contributing to an excellent product. These factors or metrics as we call them, are power, ride, range, portability, and braking. These metrics, and how exactly we evaluated them, are discussed at length below.
Turn and burn. The razor’s twist grip accelerator.
This metric is a way of measuring hill-climbing ability and flat ground top speed. To examine the last, we picked two hills (3.5% and 10.5% grade) and ran the scooter up them – if indeed they could. On the shallower of both, the E300’s max speed was reduced by 5-7 mph. However, one tester noted that he was skeptical that the scooter could have continued were the hill any more. The steeper grade had not been attempted for concern with breaking the merchandise before further tests could possibly be completed. (note: the E300 eventually did break during testing).
To determine speed we took the Razor out with a completely charged battery and cranked the throttle taking it to its maximum cruising speed and timed how long it took to go 100 feet. This trial was run 3 x and the results were averaged. At 11.95 mph, the E300 reaches underneath of the class.
The Razor E300’s beefy pneumatic tires give a smooth ride.
This metric is merely an assessment of how aware our testers were of rough road surfaces and unexpected cracks. This is among the categories where the E300 excelled; mainly because of its 9″ pneumatic tires.
The Razor’s single disk brake is operated by a hand lever.
To acquire a grasp on a scooter’s braking power we viewed two critical conditions; namely, hill braking and flat ground stopping. The foremost is an analysis of the machine’s capability to regulate speed when descending a steep hill. The next evaluates the stopping distance on flat ground. Despite having only 1 (disk) brake, the Razor did quite nicely in both these tests. However, having less redundancy in the brake system raises safety concerns.
The Razor gets the shortest travel radius in the class.
The range metric can be an analysis of travel radius and battery charging time. Whenever we started testing for ranger we quickly realized that people had a need to subdivide travel radius into two parts to accurately describe the performance of the scooters being tested. The first part may be the effective range, which is the quantity of miles traversed at full speed on flat ground. The next part may be the maximum range, which may be the distance the scooter will go at any speed. Here the E300 shows the problematic nature of its sealed lead acid battery. There is a major gap between your maximum miles (5.9) and the effective miles (4.7) delivered on a charge, and both were well below those delivered by the lithium-ion counterparts. Additionally, the battery was slow to charge taking about 6 ½ hours. The maker notes in the manual that normally it takes up to a day to fully charge.
The Razor’s insufficient a folding mechanism for the steering column, it’s heavy steel frame construction, and it’s really generally bulky design advise that its designers didn’t have portability at heart. As such, the scooter received the cheapest marks in the class in this category.
Given the general insufficient performance delivered, and our E300 broke in a few days of purchase. We cannot say that product is an excellent value.
We would advise that a potential consumer look elsewhere for a power scooter. Even if you are looking to grab among these machines for the youngsters to experiment on in the driveway, there are better options at the purchase price.