Pros
Consistently good image quality
AMD FreeSync and 144Hz operation
Genre-specific game modes
Good control and ergonomic options
Cons
Rival from BenQ has more features
A bit more expensive than the competition
Key Specifications
Review Price: £470.00
28in 2,560 x 1,440 IPS display
AMD FreeSync over DisplayPort
144Hz mode
60Hz over HDMI
1 x HDMI 1.4a
2 x DisplayPort 1.2
2 x USB 3
Manufacturer: Asus
What’s the Asus MG279Q?
This gaming screen from Asus includes a 1440p resolution and a 27-inch diagonal, but that’s not absolutely all to like. It’s got AMD FreeSync up to speed to create games run smoother, and it’s got screen modes that match different game genres – a concept that’s likely to boost gameplay through screen modifications.

Most of these features cost £470, that is a fair chunk of money. May be the Asus worth that cash when stacked against rivals and cheaper panels?

Related: AMD FreeSync COMPREHENSIVE

Asus MG279Q – Specs & Design
The main feature upon this screen is AMD FreeSync. It’s made to remove the visual tears and stutters that may occur whenever a monitor’s refresh rate has gone out of sync with a graphics card’s frame rate. It functions by matching the refresh rate of the monitor to the frame rate of the graphics card, this means smoother gaming regardless of the speed of which a title is running.

It’s an identical technology to Nvidia G-Sync, but FreeSync is merely an addition to DisplayPort, so it’s more likely to become a lot more commonplace than Nvidia’s proprietary hardware. At this time, though, it needs an AMD graphics card to work.
The more accessible FreeSync standard ensures that more monitors with this technology are beginning to appear. The most prominent may be the BenQ XL2730Z, which shares AMD’s technology along with lots of the other features included on the Asus.

The Asus is a 1440p panel which has a 27-inch diagonal. That’s smack in the center of what dedicated gaming screens offer nowadays, and it’s simple to understand why: the resolution means that top titles can look great, but it’s insufficient to prove too taxing for some graphics cards. It’s also the specific match of the BenQ.

The Asus comes with an IPS screen, this means it will deliver good viewing angles and accurate colours – nonetheless it may suffer with regards to response times, because that’s a location where in fact the BenQ’s TN technology usually wins.

The panel can be a 144Hz unit, this means it could churn frames out at a lot more than twice the speed of all traditional screens. That’s another technology that may make games smoother, although titles run at this specific rate can make more demands of a graphics card, so high-end hardware is advisable.

Asus has supported this technology with numerous other game-friendly features. Its GamePlus option can be utilised to lay a crosshair and a timer outrageous of the panel, and it’s got a low-blue light mode and flicker-free technology. They’re both suitable for reducing eye-strain during long gaming sessions.

The Asus has good practicality, too. It’s got 150mm of height adjustment, and the stand can be utilised to swivel the screen into portrait mode, tilt it back or forward or pivot it left or right. The trunk has two USB 3 ports, an HDMI socket and a mini-DisplayPort output. That’s fine, but it’s a shame that the USB ports aren’t side-facing – their downward-facing position makes them awkward to attain.

It’s a reasonably clean bill of health, however the BenQ is a lot more impressive. The screen’s position could be changed by various dials, and it’s got a carry handle and a retractable headphone stand. Its USB ports are side-facing, and the OSD is operated with a USB-based handy remote control.

There’s little to select between your two screens in terms of dimensions and aesthetic design. The Asus’ 238mm depth is merely 12mm deeper compared to the BenQ. The Asus weighs 7.3kg, which is 200g significantly less than its rival.

Both panels do little to stick out with their looks. The Asus has angles, a set base and a matte finish, and the BenQ is comparable – really the only difference may be the glossy finish on the trunk.

Related: Our Updated Verdict on 2015’s Greatest Games

Asus MG279Q – Setup
The Asus’ setup was conventional: the bottom mounted on the stand with one screw, and the stand plugs into the rear of the panel with small hooks instead of any screws. It’s all very easy.

The MG279Q’s control method works well, too. Six buttons sit behind the right-hand side of the screen and match clear white icons on leading of the screen. The very best button is the most significant, since it also functions as just a little joystick – after the on-screen display is activated, it’s used to navigate and choose most options.

The joystick is responsive and tactile, it’s simple to press the button, and the menu itself is fast and clear – and it’s helped by an excellent layout and smart, clear visual design. The Asus doesn’t have the separate controller of the BenQ, but that is about as effective as on-screen controls get.

Mike spent some time working as a technology journalist for greater than a decade, writing for almost all of the UK’s most well-known websites and magazines. During his time authoring technology he’s developed obsessio…